Archive for the ‘AVAYA’ Category
Posted by Mino on August 10, 2009
One of the frustrating drawbacks when Implementing OCS enterprise voice integrating with Cisco Call Manager or other PBX is that No name would appear in Communicator 2007 when a telephone user calls a Communications Server 2007 user or vice versa .
The only solution by then was to place a media gateway in the middle between mediation and IP-PBX and use a translation feature built in the media gateway to edit the packet header and add Caller Name before sending it to the PBX.
But Finally Microsoft has listened to my prayers and they have released July fix for OCS 2007 R2, once they were released our team started to do the testing in our LABs. At the beginning things didn’t work fine but in the end it worked and it appeared that we only applied the server side updates while the KB 971844 includes Office Communicator update too.
However, even with these fixes, this don’t send display name by default. So, this configuration in KB 972721 will be also necessary. Below are the snapshots taken by our Engineer Amr Nassar who has worked on this and successfully made it work after applying those Fixes.
Calling from Office Communicator R2 with ext 6000 to Cisco IP Phone with ext 10000

Calling from Cisco IP Phone with ext 10000 to Office Communicator R2 with ext 6000

But let me also share Microsoft explanation on why this problem happens in the first place and what these updates fix?
Problem Explanation:
When a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) telephone user calls a Microsoft Office Communications Server (OCS) 2007 R2 user, the calling party name that exists in PBX is stripped at the OCS 2007 R2 Mediation Server. Because the PBX telephone user does not exist in Active Directory, no name appears in Microsoft Office Communicator 2007 R2
This problem occurs because the OCS 2007 R2 Mediation Server does not forward the display name information from the Unified Communications (UC) side to the gateway side. Therefore, the Communicator 2007 R2 client does not receive the display name information.
Update 970679 introduces functionality for the Mediation Server role of Communications Server 2007 R2 to forward Display Name information that is part of the From header between its gateway side and its proxy side.
A file called MediationServerSvc.exe.config should be created in the Mediation Installation Directory which be default is at %programfiles%\Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007\Mediation Server
This file should contain.
<?xml version=”1.0″ encoding=”utf-8″ ?>
<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key=”forwardDisplayName” value=”True” />
</appSettings>
</configuration>
Posted in AVAYA, Cisco 4.x Integration, Cisco 5.x Integration, Cisco 6.x Integration, Cisco 7.x Integration, Mediation Server, Nortel CS1000, OCS 2007 R2, PBX Integration, Phone Edition, Quintum's gateways, communicator client | Tagged: Cisco, Cisco 4.x Integration, Cisco 5.x Integration, cisco call manager 4.x, Cisco Direct SIP with OCS, Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.0, Communicator 2007 R2 client, forward Display Name information, KB 971844, MediationServerSvc.exe.config, No Name Appears When Callings from OC to Cisco, OCS 2007 R2 Mediation Server does not forward the display name information, ocs cisco, ocs cisco integration, Update 970679 | 1 Comment »
Posted by Mino on March 9, 2009
Any Post starting with this disclaimer means that this post was not written by me however I have liked it and added to my blog. I will also include the link to the original or Similar post to provide credit to the original author.
http://blogs.technet.com/jenstr/archive/2007/11/13/how-to-enable-inbound-fax-for-enterprise-voice-and-exchange-2007-um-enabled-ocs-2007-users.aspx
Exchange 2007 SP1 UM supports both voice mail and incoming fax to a given extension. However, if the user is both UM-enabled and enabled for Enterprise Voice using OCS 2007, incoming fax is not supported using the same extension. The reason being that OCS 2007 Mediation Server does not currently support T.38.
How is it possible to provide incoming fax support for Enterprise Voice enabled users? The answer is to use a separate extension for fax and route fax calls to this extension directly to Exchange 2007 SP1 UM outside of OCS 2007.
Let’s assume we have a company called Contoso with the environment shown below and we will use that company to explain the issue and the solution

The OCS 2007 environment is connected to the PBX via a SIP/PSTN gateway called PSTNOCSGWY. The PBX routes all calls to the DID range +131255xxxxx to OCS 2007. OCS 2007 is integrated with the Exchange 2007 SP1 UM server called UMSRV1. It hosts a UM Dial Plan called OcsUmDialPlan of UriType = SipName (required for OCS 2007 integration). There is a UM Mailbox Policy associated with this UM dial plan called OcsUm. Exchange 2007 SP1 UM is connected to the PBX via OCS 2007.
The Contoso user Test User is enabled for Enterprise Voice with the DID +13125510001 and SIP URI TestUser@contoso.com. His extension is 10001. His Enterprise Voice configuration is shown below.
To be enabled for Exchange 2007 SP1 UM the administrator would issue the following Exchange Management Shell command:
Enable-UmMailbox -id TestUser -UmMailboxPolicy OcsUmPolicy -Extensions 10001 -SIPResourceIdentifier TestUser@contoso.com -Pin 1234
Test User is now enabled for Exchange 2007 SP UM, but will not be able to receive incoming fax on extension 10001 or DID +13125510001.
As indicated above the solution is to give Test User a separate extension for fax and the extension needs to be routed to Exchange 2007 SP1 UM directly without going through OCS 2007. Contoso will therefore have to create a configuration as shown below. There is a dedicated SIP/PSTN gateway for connectivity to Exchange 2007 SP1 UM. The PBX routes the DID range +131266xxxxx to this SIP/PSTN gateway. There is a new UM Dial Plan called UmDialPlan with UriType=TelExtn. There is a UM Mailbox Policy associated with this UM dial plan called Um. The UM server UMSRV1 hosts both UM Dial Plans.
The administrator now decides that Test User should have the extra extension 11001 and DID +13126611001 as the fax number.
To enable Test User to receive fax the administrator need to issue the following Exchange Management Shell command:
Set-Mailbox -id TestUser -SecondaryAddress 11001 -SecondaryDialPlan UmDialPlan
With the above configuration Test User is now able to receive fax on DID +13126611001.

Posted in AVAYA, Cisco 4.x Integration, Cisco 5.x Integration, Cisco 6.x Integration, Cisco 7.x Integration, Mediation Server, Nortel CS1000, OCS & Exchange07, OCS 2007 R2, PBX Integration, Quintum's gateways, Unified Messaging | Tagged: DID, Enterprise voice, Exchange 2007 SP1, Exchange 2007 UM, fax, inbound fax, OCS 2007 Enterprise Voice, OCS 2007 Mediation Server, receive fax, SecondaryAddress, SIP/PSTN, T.38, TelExtn, UM Mailbox Policy, UmDialPlan, UriType, UriType=TelExtn | 4 Comments »
Posted by Mino on March 4, 2009
Any Post starting with this disclaimer means that this post was not written by me however I have liked it and added to my blog. I will also include the link to the original or Similar post to provide credit to the original author.
https://blogs.pointbridge.com/Blogs/mcgillen_matt/Pages/Post.aspx?_ID=58
One of the best places to add value to an organization is in the way contacts with customers or partners is handled. For many – this is the call center / contact center. This is how sales are made, support tickets are resolved, new customers are discovered, current customers are retained
Also we as LINK Development were able to integrate these new Contact center features with Microsoft CRM server to provide end to end Helpdesk Contact center solution on the Call handeling and on the Backend activity system.


There are several new features that can be used for call routing. I thought I’d build a matrix to keep it straight:
| R2 Feature |
Description |
Ease to Deploy |
Admin Control |
Deployment Options |
| Call Delegates |
Have an admin answer calls for you, or multiple people |
Very Easy |
End User Controlled |
Built in to OCS R2 client – point and click interface |
| Team Call |
Have calls ring a group of users simultaneously |
Very Easy |
End User Controlled |
Built in to OCS R2 client – point and click interface |
| Basic Hunt Group |
Ring a group of users in various methods: longest available, circular, serial, round-robin etc. |
Easy |
OCS Admin can delegate mgmt. to any user |
Configured in OCS console, managed via web interface |
| Enhanced Hunt Group |
Same as above, but with Welcome Message & Open/Closed Hours |
Easy |
OCS Admin can delegate mgmt. to any user |
Configured in OCS console, managed via web interface |
| Response Groups |
Call queueing, music on hold, text-to-speech, speech recognition, open/closed hours |
Medium |
OCS Admin can delegate mgmt. to any user |
Configured in OCS console, managed via web interface |
| IVR / Speech applications |
|
Somewhat Complex |
OCS Admin |
Using the UCMA 2.0 SDK, write “drag-and-drop” Windows Workflow applications / .Net applications |
| Enterprise Contact Center Functionality |
Write your own contact center workflows |
Complex |
OCS Admin |
Using the UCMA 2.0 SDK, write “drag-and-drop” Windows Workflow applications / .Net applications |
IVR / Contact Center Applications with the UCMA 2.0 SDK
This is by far the most exciting feature of OCS R2. MS is giving away the toolkit (the Unified Communications Mangaed API aka UCMA SDK) to write your own IVR apps and contact center apps: anyone with an IM client can be an “agent”! No additional licensing necessary. This is going to change the way people do contact centers.
Posted in AVAYA, Cisco 4.x Integration, Cisco 5.x Integration, Cisco 6.x Integration, Cisco 7.x Integration, Nortel CS1000, OCS 2007 R2, PBX Integration, Quintum's gateways | Tagged: Call Delegates, Contact Center, Enterprise Contact Center, Hunt Group, IVR / Speech applications, Microsoft CRM, OCS 2007 R2 responce group service, Response Groups, Team Call, UCMA 2.0 SDK | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Mino on February 1, 2009
Hi all,
As i have promissed you that I will be back with lots of great information regarding the AVAYA integration.
here we go , i was working with a huge client in Dubai where he has just purchased an AVAYA IP-PBX along with Sip Enablement Server ( SES ) and AVAYA Application Enablement Server ( AES ) .
ok first of all lets us all memorize these two terms , AVAYA SES and AVAYA AES because we will be talking about them both allot.
There are two stories for the AVAYA-Microsoft integration , the AVAYA story and the Microsoft story. we will talk about both stories and the integration idea from each vendor , the limititions from each way of integration along with the pros and cons.
Microsoft Story :
For Microsoft the integration with AVAYA is simply by dealing with them as two separate IP-PBX where Microsoft has an extensions of 3xxx for example and AVAYA with extensions of 7xxx .where you need to create a SIP trunk between both of them to be able to call from here to there and vise verse.
This assures microsoft that the call processing will happen in the Mediation server , which is the target of Microsoft in order to help its users to move to the Microsoft IP PBX concept bit by bit.
for this type of integration you will need AVAYA SIP enablement server only which shall give the AVAYA communication manager the SIP capability to communicate with other system , in this SES we will configure a sip trunk for the 3xxx extensions to route to the mediation Server over TCP-IP port 5060 or through TLS over 5061 after you configure the certificate on the SES Server.
below is a diagram for this type of integration .

Good Thing :
1- AVAYA SES is not costy at all , 2-Full featured OCS capabilities including conferencing, 3- you can do dual forking workarround by adding AVAYA extensions as the similtaniously ring another number in OCS
Bad thing:
no dual forking between AVAYA and OCS which means that each person will have two extensions .
in my oppenion , no Big deal …the client was so happy with this scenario because the second AVAYA scenario will cost him 60$ per users license plus it will not provide him with all capabilities of OCS ( the conferencing for example is dimmed )
in the Second article we will discuss the second way of integration through the AVAYA AES Server
Posted in AVAYA | Tagged: AVAYA, AVAYA OCS Integration, AVAYA SES, AVAYA Sip Enablement Server, Dual Forking, OCS 2007 R2, OCS Enterprise Voice | 1 Comment »
Posted by Mino on November 17, 2008
These Application Notes describe the configuration procedures for enabling Microsoft Office
Communicator (MOC) clients to operate Avaya Communication Manager phones. The MOC
client and Microsoft Office Communications Server (OCS) provide the user with multiple
modes of communications, such as Instant Messaging (IM), voice, and video. The
configuration steps described herein focus on the TR/87 integration between Avaya
Application Enablement Services and Microsoft OCS. The TR/87 integration allows MOC
clients to make and answer calls on Avaya Communication Manager phones, as well as
perform basic call control operations such as hold/retrieve, transfer, and disconnect.
ocs-acm-rcc
Posted in AVAYA, PBX Integration, communicator client | Tagged: AVAYA, AVAYA Communication Manager, AVAYA OCS Integration | Leave a Comment »